1. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, and WAME collaborated to identify principles of transparency and best practice for scholarly publications.

  2. Selection of external links that AJOL hopes will be useful additional sources of information to researchers.
    Resource: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajol/resources-for-researchers

  3. What is Open Access.
    Resource: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajol/about-Open-Access

  4. Various Resources: https://oaaustralasia.org/resources/

  5. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) flowcharts on publication ethics (to help define the most common steps when considering allegations or evidence of scientific misconduct and other publication ethics issues).
    Resource: https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts-new/translations

  6. Ten Core Practices – 10 best practice guidelines for editors and journal publishers, covering issues like how to deal with allegations of misconduct; authorship and contributorship; conflicts of interest, post publication corrections, etc.
    Resource: https://publicationethics.org/core-practices

  7. EQUATOR guidelines for reporting research (indispensable for authors and editors to use as a checklist and background explanation for different study designs and considerations)
    Resource: https://www.equator-network.org/

  8. WAME Policy on Relationships Between Journal Editors in Chief and Owners (what should editors in chief consider when taking on the editor role?)
    Resource: https://wame.org/editorial-independence

  9. Think.Check.Submit resource to help identify trusted resources (vs predatory/deceptive publications)
    Resource: https://thinkchecksubmit.org/ 

  10. Council of Science Editors Sample Correspondence for an Editorial Office.
    Resource: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/sample-correspondence-for-an-editorial-office/

  11. Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE) Recommendations on Best Practice. Developed at the World Conferences on Research Integrity, these recommendations “aim to address issues surrounding cooperation and liaison between institutions (e.g. universities) and journals about possible and actual problems with the integrity of reported research arising before and after publication.”
    Resource: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3

  12. JPPS framework that can be downloaded in English, French and Spanish, and was developed as a learning tool for journals to progress in a semi-structured approach towards increasingly complex quality practices, and the transparent sharing (and assessment) of these.
    Resource: https://www.journalquality.info/en/about/download-jpps-framework/

  13. Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement.
    Resource: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0/
  14. Handbook for Journal Editors. https://www.inasp.info/editorshandbook – Handbook for Journal Editors by INASP
  15. Journal Publishing Guide: Publishing Best Practices Checklist by the University of Toronto Libraries Journal Production Services.
    Resource: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/pubguide/publishingbestpractices
Modifié le: mercredi 7 septembre 2022, 08:32